Fastest Star Ever Seen In The Milky Way Is Headed Out Of Our Galaxy
 |  By
Posted: Updated:

Almost a decade after its discovery, astronomers have learned that a compact star dubbed US 708 is moving faster than any other star ever observed in the Milky Way galaxy.

The record-setting hypervelocity star has been clocked at 746 miles per second, or 2.7 million miles per hour. That’s so fast that astronomers say it will escape the gravity of our galaxy (in 25 million years).

“At that speed, you could travel from Earth to the moon in five minutes,” Dr. Eugene Magnier, an astronomer at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and one of the researchers involved in the discovery, said in a written statement.

The ultra-fast star was first discovered in 2005, Discovery News reported. Then, over the past several years, Magnier and his colleagues used the Keck II and Pan-STARRS1 telescopes in Hawaii to measure the star’s velocity and trajectory.

The observations showed that US 708 — now a helium star — was likely once a red giant in orbit around a massive white dwarf. As the white dwarf stripped US 708 of hydrogen and helium, it exploded in a supernova and sent US 708 flying. (Check out the video above for an animation of the violent event.)

“It’s like if you are riding a swing carousel, where you are connected with a chain, and you cut the chain — then you fly away from the carousel,” Dr. Stephan Geier, a postdoctoral researcher at the European Southern Observatory and a co-author of a paper describing the discovery, told “In this case the carousel explodes.”

The paper was published online March 6 in the journal Science.


Hubble surveys debris-strewn exoplanetary construction yards |

These dusty disks were imaged around stars as young as 10 million years old and as mature as more than 1 billion years old.

By STScl, Baltimore, Maryland | Published: Friday, November 07, 2014

Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope have completed the largest and most sensitive visible-light imaging survey of dusty debris disks around other stars. These dusty disks, likely created by collisions between leftover objects from planet formation, were imaged around stars as young as 10 million years old and as mature as more than 1 billion years old.

“It’s like looking back in time to see the kinds of destructive events that once routinely happened in our solar system after the planets formed,” said Glenn Schneider of the University of Arizona’s Steward Observatory.

Once thought to be simply pancake-like structures, the unexpected diversity and complexity of these dusty debris structures strongly suggest they are being gravitationally affected by unseen planets orbiting the stars. Alternatively, these effects could result from the stars’ passing through interstellar space.

The researchers discovered that no two “disks” of material surrounding stars look the same. “We find that the systems are not simply flat with uniform surfaces,” Schneider said. “These are actually pretty complicated 3-D debris systems, often with embedded smaller structures. Some of the substructures could be signposts of unseen planets.” The astronomers used Hubble’s Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph to study 10 previously discovered circumstellar debris systems, plus comparatively MP Mus, a mature protoplanetary disk of age comparable to the youngest of the debris disks.

Irregularities observed in one ring-like system in particular, around a star called HD 181327, resemble the ejection of a huge spray of debris into the outer part of the system from the recent collision of two bodies.

“This spray of material is fairly distant from its host star — roughly twice the distance that Pluto is from the Sun,” said Christopher Stark of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “Catastrophically destroying an object that massive at such a large distance is difficult to explain, and it should be very rare. If we are in fact seeing the recent aftermath of a massive collision, the unseen planetary system may be quite chaotic.”

Another interpretation for the irregularities is that the disk has been mysteriously warped by the star’s passage through interstellar space, directly interacting with unseen interstellar material. “Either way, the answer is exciting,” Schneider said. “Our team is currently analyzing follow-up observations that will help reveal the true cause of the irregularity.”

Over the past few years, astronomers have found an incredible diversity in the architecture of exoplanetary systems — planets are arranged in orbits that are markedly different from those found in our solar system. “We are now seeing a similar diversity in the architecture of accompanying debris systems,” Schneider said. “How are the planets affecting the disks, and how are the disks affecting the planets? There is some sort of interdependence between a planet and the accompanying debris that might affect the evolution of these exoplanetary debris systems.”

From this small sample, the most important message to take away is one of diversity, Schneider said. He added that astronomers really need to understand the internal and external influences on these systems, such as stellar winds and interactions with clouds of interstellar material, and how they are influenced by the mass and age of the parent star and the abundance of heavier elements needed to build planets. Although astronomers have found nearly 4,000 exoplanet candidates since 1995, mostly by indirect detection methods, only about two dozen light-scattering circumstellar debris systems have been imaged over that same time period. That’s because the disks are typically 100,000 times fainter than, and often very close to, their bright parent stars. The majority has been seen because of Hubble’s ability to perform high-contrast imaging, in which the overwhelming light from the star is blocked to reveal the faint disk that surrounds the star.

The new imaging survey also yields insight into how our solar system formed and evolved 4.6 billion years ago. In particular, the suspected planet collision seen in the disk around HD 181327 may be similar to how the Earth-Moon system formed, as well as the Pluto-Charon system over 4 billion years ago. In those cases, collisions between planet-sized bodies cast debris that then coalesced into a companion moon.

Solar Flares Disrupt Communications on Earth, Could Send Shockwave on Friday the 13th

~~access related photos at the link above…

By Colleen Curry
Jun 11, 2014 4:34pm

The sun has had three major solar flares on its surface in the past two days that have affected communications on Earth and could send a shockwave through Earth this Friday, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The “solar events” caused brief blackouts in high frequency communications when they struck, twice on Tuesday morning and once this morning, all between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. EDT.

Three X-class flares erupted from the left side of the sun; the first two from left occurred June 10, 2014, and the last occurred June 11, 2014. (Goddard/SDO/NASA)

Solar flares are bursts of radiation on the sun’s surface. The disturbance to Earth’s atmosphere can disrupt GPS and communications signals, according to NASA.

One of the flares created a “coronal mass ejection” that actually could come into contact with Earth on Friday, according to NOAA. The ejection is essentially a huge cloud of plasma that could hit the Earth and cause a shock wave, affecting communications systems. If an ejection were to hit Earth on Friday, scientists expect it would only cause a minor geo-magnetic storm, according to NOAA.

The flares were observed by NASA, which posted stunning photos and videos of the events on its website.

Liquid Ocean Sloshes under Saturn Moon’s Icy Crust, Cassini Evidence Shows

Apr 3, 2014 |By Clara Moskowi

A liquid-water ocean hides under the frozen surface of Saturn’s moon Enceladus, new evidence confirms. The presence of this water boosts Enceladus’ ranking among the top places in the solar system to look for extraterrestrial life, scientists say.

Enceladus has intrigued researchers since 2005, when NASA’s Cassini probe discovered water-rich plumes spewing from the moon’s south pole, raising the possibility that they were venting from a buried liquid sea. The same probe has now bolstered the sea hypothesis by measuring Enceladus’ gravitational field. Scientists carefully monitored how the moon deflected Cassini off course and determined that Enceladus must have more mass at its south pole than meets the eye. Because liquid water is denser than ice, a buried ocean could contribute this hidden mass, the investigators reasoned. “It’s very difficult to come up with any explanation for the data that does not involve a thick layer of liquid water beneath the ice,” says California Institute of Technology planetary scientist David Stevenson, a co-author of a paper reporting the finding that will appear in the April 4 Science. Although the gravity data provides no proof that the liquid is water and not something else, water is the likeliest explanation because it is plentiful on Enceladus (albeit mostly seen in the form of ice) and because rock in its place would not produce the gravitational pattern seen, Stevenson explains.

Although plumes could form from the melting of surface ice, a connection to an underground source of water is also likely. And the fact that Enceladus’s plumes stem from its south pole, the same location where the putative ocean resides, is another factor in favor of the water ocean explanation. “These new results are like the point in a detective story where finding the fingerprints confirms the hypothesis based on motive and opportunity,” says Larry Esposito, a planetary scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder who was not involved in the study. Stevenson himself admits to having been skeptical until now. “Before these results I personally thought it was not at all clear that Enceladus had an ocean,” Stevenson told reporters during a teleconference on Wednesday. “You can make water just by rubbing ice blocks together, so it wasn’t clear to me that you had a huge volume. We now know that we do.”

Cassini’s data imply a subsurface ocean about 10 kilometers deep that covers an area about the size of Lake Superior. It would be buried underneath roughly 50 kilometers of frozen ice. Such a reservoir could theoretically host some form of life, which is thought to rely on liquid water. “There are terrestrial organisms that would be perfectly comfortable in that environment,” said study co-author Jonathan Lunine, a planetary scientist at Cornell University. “It makes the interior of Enceladus potentially a very attractive place to look for life.”

Enceladus is not the only solar system body that may host an underground ocean. Jupiter’s moon Europa, another prime target for extraterrestrial life searches, is thought to contain a global ocean underneath its surface ice, and the other Jovian satellites, Callisto and Ganymede, also show evidence of subsurface seas. Whereas Ganymede’s ocean probably sits on a deeper layer of ice, the water on Enceladus would lie atop the moon’s silicate core. Because silicate could provide some of the chemicals necessary for life—such as salts, phosphorus and sulfur—this arrangement may offer the chance for those chemicals to mix with liquid water and brew life, Lunine said.

The latest findings required researchers to painstakingly track Cassini’s motion by monitoring minute changes in the frequency of the signal it sent back to Earth, called Doppler shifts. “It’s the same thing they’re using for the Malaysian plane but we can do it more accurately,” Stevenson says. After collecting data during three passes Cassini made near Enceladus, scientists could estimate the moon’s gravity field well enough to determine that some extra mass is beneath Enceladus’s surface. “If correct, it provides important new information about what might be going on well below the vents,” says University of Idaho planetary scientist Matthew Hedman, who was not involved in the research. “One important question that I think still needs answering is how such an ocean connects up with the surface to produce the plumes.” Another question is why Enceladus’s north pole so far shows no sign of plume activity or an ocean. Scientists think gravitational tides from Saturn could be heating the moon’s interior, melting ice to form the ocean. This heating would likely be greatest at the poles. “I don’t know why it is only at the south,” Stevenson says.

The new evidence and the questions it raises are only making scientists more eager to devote some of Cassini’s remaining time at Saturn to studying Enceladus. The spacecraft arrived at the ringed planet in 2004 and is due to die a spectacular death by plunging into the Saturnian atmosphere in 2017. Before then, Cassini has three more targeted flybys of Enceladus scheduled. Hopefully, more discoveries await.

Fierce 2012 magnetic storm barely missed Earth

According to scientists, a rapid succession of coronal mass ejections sent a pulse of magnetized plasma barreling into space and through Earth’s orbit.

By University of California, Berkeley | Published: Wednesday, March 19, 2014

According to University of California, Berkeley, and Chinese researchers, a rapid succession of coronal mass ejections — the most intense eruptions on the Sun — sent a pulse of magnetized plasma barreling into space and through Earth’s orbit. Had the eruption come nine days earlier, it would have hit Earth, potentially wreaking havoc with the electrical grid, disabling satellites and GPS, and disrupting our increasingly electronic lives.

The solar bursts would have enveloped Earth in magnetic fireworks matching the largest magnetic storm ever reported on Earth, the so-called Carrington event of 1859. The dominant mode of communication at that time, the telegraph system, was knocked out across the United States, literally shocking telegraph operators. Meanwhile, the northern lights lit up the night sky as far south as Hawaii.

In a paper, Ying D. Liu from China’s State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Janet G. Luhmann from the University of California, Berkeley, and their colleagues report their analysis of the magnetic storm, which was detected by NASA’s STEREO A spacecraft.

“Had it hit Earth, it probably would have been like the big one in 1859, but the effect today, with our modern technologies, would have been tremendous,” said Luhmann.

A study last year estimated that the cost of a solar storm like the Carrington event could reach $2.6 trillion worldwide. A considerably smaller event March 13, 1989, led to the collapse of Canada’s Hydro-Quebec power grid and a resulting loss of electricity to 6 million people for up to nine hours.

“An extreme space weather storm — a solar superstorm — is a low-probability, high-consequence event that poses severe threats to critical infrastructures of the modern society,” warned Liu. “The cost of an extreme space weather event, if it hits Earth, could reach trillions of dollars with a potential recovery time of 4–10 years. Therefore, it is paramount to the security and economic interest of the modern society to understand solar superstorms.”

Based on their analysis of the 2012 event, Liu, Luhmann and their STEREO colleagues concluded that a huge outburst on the Sun on July 22 propelled a magnetic cloud through the solar wind at a peak speed of more than 1,200 miles (2,000 kilometers) per second — four times the typical speed of a magnetic storm. It tore through Earth’s orbit, but, luckily, Earth and the other planets were on the other side of the Sun at the time. Any planets in the line of sight would have suffered severe magnetic storms as the magnetic field of the outburst tangled with the planets’ own magnetic fields.

The researchers determined that the huge outburst resulted from at least two nearly simultaneous coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which typically release energies equivalent to that of about a billion hydrogen bombs. The speed with which the magnetic cloud plowed through the solar wind was so high, they concluded, because another mass ejection four days earlier had cleared the path of material that would have slowed it down.

“The authors believe this extreme event was due to the interaction of two CMEs separated by only 10 to 15 minutes,” said Joe Gurman from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

One reason the event was potentially so dangerous, aside from its high speed, is that it produced a long-duration, southward-oriented magnetic field, Luhmann said. This orientation drives the largest magnetic storms when they hit Earth because the southward field merges violently with Earth’s northward field in a process called reconnection. Storms that normally might dump their energy only at the poles instead dump it into the radiation belts, ionosphere, and upper atmosphere and create aurorae down to the tropics.

“These gnarly, twisty ropes of magnetic field from coronal mass ejections come blasting from the Sun through the ambient solar system, piling up material in front of them, and when this double whammy hits Earth, it skews the Earth’s magnetic field to odd directions, dumping energy all around the planet,” Luhmann said. “Some of us wish Earth had been in the way; what an experiment that would have been.”

“People keep saying that these are rare natural hazards, but they are happening in the solar system even though we don’t always see them,” she said. “It’s like with earthquakes; it is hard to impress upon people the importance of preparing unless you suffer a magnitude 9 earthquake.”

All this activity would have been missed if STEREO A — the STEREO spacecraft ahead of us in Earth’s orbit and the twin to STEREO B, which trails in our orbit — had not been there to record the blast.

The goal of STEREO and other satellites probing the magnetic fields of the Sun and Earth is to understand how and why the Sun sends out these large solar storms and to be able to predict them during the Sun’s 11-year solar cycle. This event was particularly unusual because it happened during a calm solar period.

“Observations of solar superstorms have been extremely lacking and limited, and our current understanding of solar superstorms is very poor,” Liu said. “Questions fundamental to solar physics and space weather, such as how extreme events form and evolve and how severe it can be at the Earth, are not addressed because of the extreme lack of observations.”